Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador (2014)

We assess the impacts and cost-effectiveness of cash, vouchers and food transfers. •All modalities significantly improve the quantity and quality of food consumed. •Food leads to significantly larger increases in calories consumed. •Vouchers lead to significantly larger increases in dietary diversity. •Food is the least cost-effective means of improving food security outcomes.

File Type: www
Categories: Research Study
Tags: food insecurity
Author: Amber Peterman, Amy Margolies, John Hoddinott, Melissa Hidrobo, Vanessa Moreira