Putting College First: How Social and Financial Capital Impact Labor Market Participation Among Low‐Income Undergraduates (2011)

Most undergraduates work despite evidence that working while in college is associated with lower
rates of degree completion. Prior research indicates that the propensity to work varies by both family
income and education, suggesting that both financial and social capital operate to reduce work and
preserve educational advantage. We test that hypothesis with a sample of 3,000 low‐income
Wisconsin undergraduates enrolled in the state’s 42 public two‐year and four‐year colleges and
universities. Leveraging an experiment that distributes financial aid via lottery, we identify effects of
financial capital on labor force participation that are comparable in magnitude to the positive benefits
of social capital obtained through parental education. Specifically, the allocation of additional financial
aid reduces the hours worked by low‐income students with high school‐educated parents to the point
that it nearly fully offsets the socioeconomic advantage (in terms of fewer hours worked) that accrues
to students from college‐educated families. Need‐based financial aid, it appears, may be an equalizer
that promises to reduce labor force participation and enhance college attainment.

Working for College: The Causal Impacts of Financial Grants on Undergraduate Employment (2016)

One way in which financial aid is thought to promote college success is by minimizing the time students
spend working. Yet, little research has examined if this intended first-order effect occurs, and results
are mixed. We leverage a randomized experiment and find that students from low-income families in
Wisconsin offered additional grant aid were 5.88 percentage points less likely to work and worked 1.69
fewer hours per week than similar peers, an 8.56% and 14.35% reduction, respectively. Students
offered the grant also improved qualitative aspects of their work experiences; they were less likely to
work extensively, during the morning hours, or overnight. Grant aid thus appears to partially offset
student employment, possibly improving prospects for academic achievement and attainment.

Reducing Income Inequality in Educational Attainment: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Financial Aid on College Completion (2016)

Income inequality in educational attainment is a long-standing concern,
and disparities in college completion have grown over time.
Need-based financial aid is commonly used to promote equality in
college outcomes, but its effectiveness has not been established, and
some are calling it into question. A randomized experiment is used to
estimate the impact of a private need-based grant program on college
persistence and degree completion among students from low-income
families attending 13 public universities across Wisconsin. Results indicate
that offering students additional grant aid increases the odds of
bachelor’s degree attainment over four years, helping to diminish income
inequality in higher education.

A Matter of Trust: Applying Insights From Social Psychology to Make College Affordable (2016)

The rising price of higher education threatens educational opportunity and social mobility for the most vulnerable Americans.
Increasing college attendance benefits individuals and society, but efforts to reduce the price via financial aid rely primarily on
economic theory: emphasizing short-term investments for long-term gains, and aiming for efficiency by targeting a narrow band
of the population. Yet financial aid as currently implemented fails to effectively counter price barriers to college attainment.
We argue that these failures are due, in part, to policies that were built on a narrow set of behavioral assumptions about
the role of pricing in individuals’ decisions to attend college. Insights from social psychology highlight decisions’ relational
processes and contexts. Existing policy failures have eroded public trust in financial aid as a legitimate, viable mechanism for
college affordability. Cost-effective reforms that rebuild trust are a promising direction for future policy making.

Basic Needs Insecurity at Historically Black Colleges and Universities A #RealCollegeHBCU Report (2022)

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) were established primarily in the post-Civil War era to meet the educational needs of Black Americans. They provide pathways to upward social mobility and have a long-standing commitment to promoting both academic success and students’ health and well-being. But persistent funding inequities at both the state and federal levels actively undermine those commitments and leave the sector particularly vulnerable during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

This report, a collaboration between The Hope Center and the Center for the Study of HBCUs, uses data from the #RealCollege Survey to examine the overlapping challenges affecting students attending HBCUs during fall 2020. In total, nearly 5,000 students from 14 public and private four-year HBCUs responded to the survey.

When Care Isn’t Enough: Scaling Emergency Aid During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021)

When the pandemic devastated communities and college campuses, colleges and universities faced an emergency. For the first time in history, Congress responded by authorizing billions of dollars in emergency aid to quickly alleviate hardships.

This report shows how colleges and universities met the challenge of emergency aid during the pandemic, drawing on a year of surveys and focus groups, fielded and conducted by The Hope Center and DVP-Praxis, that reflect the views of institutional leaders and students from coast to coast. The results offer valuable insights that should shape the future of emergency aid and student support. While the onset of the pandemic was unprecedented, its ongoing health concerns and the looming consequences of climate change ensure that knowing how to deliver emergency aid at scale will be essential to the well-being of future students. With these lessons in mind, we can all be better prepared and ready to respond.

The Real Price of College: Estimating and Supporting Students’ Financial Needs (2021)

For decades, complicated financial aid formulas and variable sticker prices have made it difficult for students to understand the real price of college. For colleges, understanding students’ financial need is also challenging; current financial aid formulas cause many students’ actual need to be understated.
This report examines what happens when:
financial aid leaders and staff better understand students’ financial need, as operationalized by negative EFC; and
students better understand college costs and how to advocate for more financial support.
Using data gathered at Temple University and six colleges and universities in Texas, we explore how more nuanced information about college costs and financial need can change beliefs and behavior among financial aid staff, leaders, and students.